2Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery,
3Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery,
Correspondence Address: Dr. Moran Amit, MD, PhD, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA. E-mail: email@example.com
© The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Solid tumors are complex collections of cells surrounded by benign tissues that influence and are influenced by the tumor. These surrounding cells include vasculature, immune cells, neurons, and other cell types, and are collectively known as the tumor microenvironment. Tumors manipulate their microenvironment for the benefit of the tumor. Autonomic neurons innervate and drive malignant growth in a variety of solid tumors. However, the mechanisms underlying neuron-tumor relationships are not well understood. Recently, Amit et al. described that trophic relationships between oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OCSCCs) and nearby autonomic neurons arise through direct signaling between tumors and local neurons. An inducible tumor model in which 4NQO was introduced into the drinking water of Trp53 knockout mice was used to model OCSCC-microenvironment interactions. Using this model, this group discovered that loss of p53 expression in OCSCC tumors resulted in increased nerve density within these tumors. This neuritogenesis was controlled by tumor-derived microRNA-laden extracellular vesicles (EVs). Specifically, EV-delivered miR-34a inhibited neuritogenesis, whereas EV-delivered miR-21 and miR-324 increased neuritogenesis. The neurons innervating p53-deficient OCSCC tumors were predominantly adrenergic and arose through the transdifferentiation of trigeminal sensory nerve fibers to adrenergic nerve fibers. This transdifferentiation corresponded with increased expression of neuron-reprogramming transcription factors, including POU5F1, KLF4, and ASCL1, which were overexpressed in the p53-deficient samples, and are proposed targets of miR-34a-mediated regulation. Human OCSCC samples enriched in adrenergic neuron markers are associated strongly with poor outcomes, thus demonstrating the relevance of these findings to cancer patients.
MicroRNA, microenvironment, adrenergic neurons, solid tumors, neurotrophic growth, neuron-tumor crosstalk
Cancers are predominantly characterized by their loss of proliferative control. Genetic changes drive this increased proliferation, resulting in the formation, growth and spread of tumor cells throughout the body. Mutations that commonly drive tumor growth, however, also drive molecular changes within the tumor and the surrounding tissues. Encircling the solid tumors are collections of healthy cells that typically act to support cell types and tissue functions in the local region. These cells include structural fibroblasts, immune cells, neurons, blood vessels, and other cell types that in combination are known as the tumor microenvironment. In the context of cancer, these supporting cells can be manipulated to support the growth and spread of the tumor. These manipulative relationships become essential for the survival of the cancer and are found in prostate[1,2], gastric[3-5], pancreatic, skin[7,8], glioma[9-11], and a variety of other tumor types[12–15]. Subsequently, efforts to interrupt the relationships between solid tumors and immune cells, as well as between tumors and blood vessels have shown efficacy in stymying tumor growth, demonstrating the widespread therapeutic potential borne from understanding these tumor-microenvironment relationships. To date, the relationships between tumors and other members of the tumor microenvironment are not well understood. Additionally, the mechanisms by which these relationships are formed and sustained are not well documented. Recent work from Amit et al. has uncovered that tumors use extracellular vesicular signaling to drive nearby neuron survival, growth, spread, and subtype switching, which, in turn, drives tumor growth.
This recent work focused on oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), an aggressive tumor arising from mouth epithelial cells. To study these tumors in greater depth, the group leveraged laboratory mouse models of OCSCC. These include mice in which the tumor suppressor p53 was conditionally knocked out of epithelial cells (Krt5cre; Tp53flox/flox). The control group for these mice lacked the Krt5cre allele, leaving Tp53 intact in all cells. In these models, tumor initiation was induced via introduction of the carcinogen, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4NQO) into the drinking water. Additionally, the group used patient-derived xenograft models in which p53WT or p53null OCSCC cells were injected into the tongues of mice and allowed to grow. Finally, in cell culture dishes, dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were co-cultured with oral keratinocytes and p53WT or p53null OCSCC cells to model neural interactions with OCSCC tumors in vitro.
Initially, the group found that in tumor samples derived from both their conditional p53 knockout mice, as well as their patient-derived xenograft models, loss of p53 coincided with increased adrenergic nerve density within the tumor. These findings were recapitulated in human OSCSS samples, indicating that tumor cells lacking p53 were driving increased adrenergic neuritogenesis. When testing this same hypothesis using in vitro OCSCC-DRG co-cultures, Amit et al. concordantly found increased DRG innervation of p53null OCSCC cells. When p53WT OCSCC-DRG co-cultures were incubated with conditioned medium containing extracellular vesicles (EVs) from p53null OCSCC cells, the same neuritogenic effect was observed. Additionally, when the p53null OCSCC cells co-cultured with DRGs were inhibited from releasing EVs, the effect was lost, thus demonstrating that the p53null-derived EVs and their contents were the driving force behind the described neuritogenic effect.
Extracellular vesicles serve as important vehicles of small regulatory RNA species, which are known to be essential for proper neuronal development and function. By comparing the small RNAs found within EVs derived from p53WT and p53null cell lines, Amit et al. found that 17 microRNAs (miRNAs) were down-regulated in p53null cells. After narrowing this collection of miRNAs to the most down-regulated species, they found that several of these miRNAs, including miR-34a, were also down-regulated in the p53null tumors found within in vivo mouse models. Thus, these data suggest that miR-34a, and other similarly acting miRNAs, prevent neuritogenesis and that, when lost in p53null EVs, the surrounding neurons exhibit increased neuritogenesis. In concert with this hypothesis, the group next inhibited miR-34a by transfecting cultured neurons with an antagomiR that specifically inhibits miR-34a. This experiment resulted in increased neuritogenesis in the antagomiR-34a transfected neurons when compared to neurons transfected with scrambled antagomiRs, thus confirming the hypothesis that miR-34a from p53WT-derived EVs acts to prevent neuritogenesis.
To complement these findings, they next identified candidate miRNAs that drive neuritogenesis. Towards this effort, they uncovered that antagomiR-mediated inhibition of miR-21 and miR-324 resulted in decreased neuritogenesis in transfected neurons when compared to those transfected with scramble antagomiRs. Conversely, transfection of neurons directly with a combination of miR-21 and miR-324 resulted in a robust increase in neuritogenesis when compared to neurons transfected with scramble miRNA molecules. Moreover, adding miR-34a to this combination of miR-21 and miR-324 decreased neuritogenesis, demonstrating that cancer-driven neuritogenic processes lie in a delicate balance, dictated, at least in part, by these miRNAs.
The researchers noticed that these newly formed neurites stained positively for the adrenergic marker tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), demonstrating thereby that the responding neurons were adrenergic in nature. However, upon exposure to EVs derived from p53null OCSCC tumors, they found that the number of adrenergic neurons increased dramatically in both the in vitro and in vivo models, suggesting that p53null-derived EVs were promoting an adrenergic state. Conversely, exposure to p53WT-derived EVs decreased the number of intratumoral TH-positive adrenergic neurites, suggesting that these wildtype EVs inhibit cancer-associated adrenergic neuritogenesis. At this point, the researchers were uncertain about the origin of these adrenergic neurites. Amit et al. wanted to know whether these adrenergic neurites arose from previously existing adrenergic neurons or whether these newly-formed adrenergic neurites arose from another neuron type. They subsequently found that transfection of trigeminal sensory neuronal cultures with miR-21 and miR-324 resulted in increased adrenergic staining, suggestive of neurotype switching from a sensory to a sympathetic nature. However, when miR-34a was added to the combination of miR-21 and miR-324, the effect was lost, demonstrating that along with inhibiting neuritogenesis, miR-34a activity also inhibits neo-adrenergic neurotype switching. These findings were subsequently bolstered by transcriptomic analysis, which demonstrated that neurons incubated with EVs derived from p53null OCSCC tumors expressed increased levels of catecholamine biosynthesis-related genes and decreased levels of sensory neuron signaling genes. Specifically, the transcription factors POU5F1 and KLF4 were found to be upregulated in trigeminal neurons following incubation with EVs derived from p53null OCSCC tumors. These transcription factors are sufficient to drive neuronal differentiation of adult neural stem cells. Additionally, these two factors are directly regulated by miR-34a activity. NEUROG2 and ASCL1 are two additional factors that were upregulated in trigeminal neurons following incubation with p53null OCSCC EVs. These factors are also candidate targets of miR-34a regulation, and their activity drives neuronal differentiation, specifically to an adrenergic fate. These expression changes illustrate a neurotype switching event in sensory neurons adjacent to p53null OCSCC tumors. Moreover, the combination of the findings described thus far suggest that depletion of miR-34a in EVs released by p53null OCSCC tumors is the mechanism by which these tumors drive increased neo-adrenergic innervation of the tumor body.
Knowing that the tumor-innervating neurons that drive neurotropic tumor growth are adrenergic in nature opens up avenues for the use of readily available therapies to treat patients with OCSCCs. Beta adrenergic receptor blocking medications, for example, are already approved for the treatment of hypertension, heart arrhythmias, angina, migraines and other illnesses, and are widely available. Additional data from published clinical trials support the use of anti-adrenergic approaches to treating several types of cancers, including breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others[20-25]. Additionally, several ongoing clinical trials are testing anti-adrenergic medications as an adjuvant or stand-alone therapy in prostate and pancreatic cancers (NCT03152786, NCT02944201, NCT03838029, NCT04245644). Within this study, Amit et al. found that Carvedilol, which non-selectively blocks α1, β1, and β2 adrenergic receptors, dramatically decreased tumor growth and proliferation rates when compared to tumors within vehicle-treated mice harboring patient-derived xenografted p53null OCSCC tumors. Supporting the use of anti-adrenergic therapies in humans, this group found that the level of TH staining in human OCSCC samples was an independent predictor of increased tumor recurrence and decreased patient survival. Thus, this work argues for an increased focus on anti-adrenergic approaches for treating OCSCC as well as other cancers.
Similar to the findings by Amit et al, Magnon et al. found an increased density of TH-positive adrenergic neurons within the tumor microenvironments of patients with high-risk prostate adenocarcinomas. This group showed that the number of adrenergic neurons within the tumor microenvironment was an independent predictor of tumor recurrence. They also found a similar relationship between tumor aggression and the amount of parasympathetic vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT)-positive staining within the tumor body. However, they were not able to determine whether this increase in autonomic innervation was due to neurogenesis, neuritogenesis, neuron-type switching, or some other mechanism. Additionally, they were not able to determine if the tumor was driving this increase in autonomic neurite number, and by what means these aggressive tumors were communicating with local neurons. In contrast, the findings presented by Amit et al. shed light on possible mechanisms of communication between prostate tumors and local innervating autonomic neurons. These experiments add to the already rich literature describing the role that EVs play in regulating the tumor microenvironment and cancer metastasis. Future work in prostate adenocarcinoma should examine the EVs released by these tumors, and the miRNA contents that may be manipulating local neurons. A recent report systematically demonstrated the importance of EV contents in the development and growth of a variety of cancers. Though small RNA messengers and regulators were found to be important in mediating tumor growth in this study as well, this group provided ample evidence supporting damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and other cancer-associated proteins as essential mediators of neuron-tumor trophic interactions. These findings point to the possibility that protein messengers are important in establishing and maintaining the trophic relationships between prostate adenocarcinomas and local autonomic fibers, as well as p53null OCSCC tumors and local sensory/adrenergic neurons.
Though the mechanisms governing neuron-tumor relationships described by Amit et al. were worked out between OCSCC tumors and sensory/adrenergic neurons of the oral cavity, many of these principles might be generalizable to other tumor types and neuronal subtypes. Already, increased neuritogenesis and sensory-autonomic neurotype switching has been reported in pancreatic nerves in the context of pancreatic cancer. However, the findings presented here also differ from those published in previous work. In contrast to the findings of Magnon et al., Amit et al. found no increase in parasympathetic VAChT-positive neurites in p53null OCSCC tumors. Thus, it is possible that for each tumor type and each region of local autonomic fibers, a balance of sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons guides tumor growth and survival. Future work will need to examine these balancing forces within each tumor type and the corresponding microenvironment.
This work describes novel mechanisms of EV-mediated regulation of tumor activity, which highlights new hypotheses regarding the biology underlying these mechanisms. Differential delivery of miR-34a vs. miR-21 and miR-324 to local neurons could be the result of differential loading of miRNAs into EVs. Alternatively, the differing contents of these cancer-derived EVs could be dictated strictly by expression changes within p53null and p53WT cancer cells. Specific analysis of transcriptional changes in p53null and p53WT cancer cells, combined with detailed profiling of EV contents will allow for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms governing this described specificity of EV contents. In tandem with this, specific subpopulations of p53null and p53WT tumor cells likely contribute more to the specific release of different EV-delivered miRNAs than other subpopulations of p53null and p53WT tumor cells. Cellular heterogeneity within tumors is a well-described aspect of tumor biology that affects tumor activity, and the different mutations and transcriptional profiles found within different subpopulations may be an important driver of differential miRNA expression and release through EVs. Modern sequencing techniques, including single-cell RNA sequencing of tumor samples will be valuable in unraveling the link between specific transcriptional profiles and EV-mediated miRNA delivery. Additionally, this work argues for the increased use of EV sampling in the diagnosis, surveillance and treatment of various cancer types. Sampling EV contents from blood, plasma, and other bodily fluids is a non-invasive and cost-effective method of providing researchers and care teams with myriad signals and transporters shared between the tumor and the microenvironment[28–31]. Moreover, while these contents serve as potent biomarkers of cancer presence, diagnosis, and progression, they also provide clues as to which treatment approaches may be most effective in treating specific patients. Stemming from this work, analysis of EV contents will also identify novel proteins and RNA messengers, thereby identifying alternative signaling pathways, and furthering our understanding of how neuron-tumor trophic relationships are established and sustained.
In this work, Amit et al. uncovered a novel and potent method by which OCSCC tumors manipulate nearby sensory neurons to drive a neo-adrenergic neurotype switching event, thereby driving tumor growth and spread. These findings constitute a paradigm shift in our understanding of how tumors and neurons within the microenvironment interact with each other. Moreover, this work illustrates the importance of EV contents, and more specifically, miRNA signaling in mediating the trophic relationships between tumors and neurons that drive tumor growth. Future work will focus on further deciphering EV-mediated signaling, with a focus on developing novel approaches of using EV analysis to better understand tumor biology, and to better treat human cancer patients.
PJH and MA Conceptualized the manuscript:.
PJH wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MA supplied technical knowledge to support the manuscript throughout the revision process. PJH created the graphical abstract for the manuscript. PJH and MA contributed to the manuscript revision and approved the submitted version.Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.Financial support and sponsorship
The authors would like to thank the AHA (American Heart Association Award number 20PRE35040011) and BRASS (Baylor Research Advocates for Student Scientists) for their support (PJH). The authors would like to thank the Moon Shots Program for their support (MA). The authors would also like to thank the NIH/NCI for their support under award numbers P30CA016672 and 1R37CA242006 (MA).Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.Consent for publication
© The Author(s) 2020.
1. Magnon C, Hall SJ, Lin J, et al. Autonomic nerve development contributes to prostate cancer progression. Science 2013;341:1236361.DOIPubMed
2. Ayala GE, Wheeler TM, Shine HD, et al. In vitro dorsal root ganglia and human prostate cell line interaction: redefining perineural invasion in prostate cancer. Prostate 2001;49:213-23.DOIPubMed
3. Hayakawa Y, Sakitani K, Konishi M, et al. Nerve Growth Factor Promotes Gastric Tumorigenesis through Aberrant Cholinergic Signaling. Cancer Cell 2017;31:21-34.DOIPubMedPMC
4. Zhao CM, Hayakawa Y, Kodama Y, et al. Denervation suppresses gastric tumorigenesis. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:250ra115.DOIPubMedPMC
5. Polli-lopes AC, Zucoloto S, de Queirós Cunha F, da Silva Figueiredo LA, Garcia SB. Myenteric denervation reduces the incidence of gastric tumors in rats. Cancer Letters 2003;190:45-50.DOIPubMed
6. Cavel O, Shomron O, Shabtay A, et al. Endoneurial macrophages induce perineural invasion of pancreatic cancer cells by secretion of GDNF and activation of RET tyrosine kinase receptor. Cancer Res 2012;72:5733-43.DOIPubMed
7. Peterson SC, Eberl M, Vagnozzi AN, et al. Basal cell carcinoma preferentially arises from stem cells within hair follicle and mechanosensory niches. Cell Stem Cell 2015;16:400-12.DOIPubMedPMC
8. Keskinov AA, Tapias V, Watkins SC, Ma Y, Shurin MR, Shurin GV. Impact of the Sensory Neurons on Melanoma Growth In Vivo. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156095.DOIPubMedPMC
9. Venkataramani V, Tanev DI, Strahle C, et al. Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature 2019;573:532-8.DOIPubMed
10. Venkatesh HS, Morishita W, Geraghty AC, et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits. Nature 2019;573:539-45.DOIPubMedPMC
11. Venkatesh HS, Johung TB, Caretti V, et al. Neuronal Activity Promotes Glioma Growth through Neuroligin-3 Secretion. Cell 2015;161:803-16.DOIPubMedPMC
12. Hanoun M, Maryanovich M, Arnal-Estapé A, Frenette PS. Neural regulation of hematopoiesis, inflammation, and cancer. Neuron 2015;86:360-73.DOIPubMedPMC
13. Li HM, Ye ZH. Microenvironment of liver regeneration in liver cancer. Chin J Integr Med 2017;23:555-60.DOIPubMed
14. Soysal SD, Tzankov A, Muenst SE. Role of the Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer. Pathobiology 2015;82:142-52.DOIPubMed
15. Wang JJ, Lei KF, Han F. Tumor microenvironment: recent advances in various cancer treatments. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2018;22:3855-64.DOIPubMed
16. Wu T, Dai Y. Tumor microenvironment and therapeutic response. Cancer Lett 2017;387:61-8.DOIPubMed
17. Hollebecque A, Massard C, Soria JC. Vascular disrupting agents: a delicate balance between efficacy and side effects. Curr Opin Oncol 2012;24:305-15.DOIPubMed
18. Amit M, Takahashi H, Dragomir MP, et al. Loss of p53 drives neuron reprogramming in head and neck cancer. Nature 2020;578:449-54.DOIPubMed
19. I. Lexicomp, Propranolol: Drug information, UpToDate. (2020) 1-26. Available from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/propranolol-drug-information?search=Propranolol&source=panel_search_result&selectedTitle=1~148&usage_type=panel&kp_tab=drug_general&display_rank=1.
20. Childers WK, Hollenbeak CS, Cheriyath P. β-Blockers Reduce Breast Cancer Recurrence and Breast Cancer Death: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2015;15:426-31.DOIPubMed
21. Thiele M, Albillos A, Abazi R, Wiest R, Gluud LL, Krag A. Non-selective beta-blockers may reduce risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Liver Int 2015;35:2009-16.DOIPubMed
22. Qiao G, Chen M, Bucsek MJ, Repasky EA, Hylander BL. Adrenergic Signaling: A Targetable Checkpoint Limiting Development of the Antitumor Immune Response. Front Immunol 2018;9:164.DOIPubMedPMC
23. Melhem-Bertrandt A, Chavez-Macgregor M, Lei X, et al. Beta-blocker use is associated with improved relapse-free survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2645-52.DOIPubMedPMC
24. Watkins JL, Thaker PH, Nick AM, et al. Clinical impact of selective and nonselective beta-blockers on survival in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer 2015;121:3444-51.DOIPubMedPMC
25. Grytli HH, Fagerland MW, Fosså SD, Taskén KA. Association Between Use of β-Blockers and Prostate Cancer–Specific Survival: A Cohort Study of 3561 Prostate Cancer Patients with High-Risk or Metastatic Disease. European Urology 2014;65:635-41.DOIPubMed
26. Hoshino A, Kim HS, Bojmar L, et al. Extracellular Vesicle and Particle Biomarkers Define Multiple Human Cancers. Cell 2020;182:1044-1061.e18.DOIPubMedPMC
27. Demir IE, Friess H, Ceyhan GO. Neural plasticity in pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;12:649-59.DOIPubMed
28. Murillo OD, Thistlethwaite W, Rozowsky J, et al. exRNA Atlas Analysis Reveals Distinct Extracellular RNA Cargo Types and Their Carriers Present across Human Biofluids. Cell 2019;177:463-477.e15.DOIPubMedPMC
29. Schwarzenbach H. The clinical relevance of circulating, exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers for cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2015;15:1159-69.DOIPubMed
30. Nedaeinia R, Manian M, Jazayeri MH, et al. Circulating exosomes and exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2017;24:48-56.DOIPubMed
31. Lynch C, Panagopoulou M, Gregory CD. Extracellular Vesicles Arising from Apoptotic Cells in Tumors: Roles in Cancer Pathogenesis and Potential Clinical Applications. Front Immunol 2017;8:1174.DOIPubMedPMC
Hunt PJ, Amit M. Head and neck cancer exosomes drive microRNA-mediated reprogramming of local neurons. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucleic Acids 2020;1:57-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2020.04
Full-Text Views Each Month
PDF Downloads Each Month